Autonomous vehicles and the insurance market
The Vehicle Technology and Aviation Bill 2017 promises answers to the question of how autonomous vehicles (AVs) can be insured.
From the moment AXA became involved with automated vehicle testing they were clear about the societal benefits they thought this technology could deliver - less accidents, safer roads, reduced congestion and a mobility solution for people who are currently unable to drive, and so on.
The initial risk was that the motor insurance market would be turned upside down, but the recently published Bill represents a great first step towards an insurance system that would be both familiar to customers and deliverable by insurance companies.
By effectively placing a strict liability on insurers to pay out in the event of an accident involving an automated vehicle, the bill retains the status quo and places road user and pedestrian safety at its core.
In addition, reaffirming the rights of recovery available to insurers under existing legislation (negligence, products liability, etc.), means that the burden of liability will not fall heavily on those who will be responsible for the pioneering research and development – motor manufacturers, tech and software companies – thereby potentially stifling innovation.
Frustratingly, there will be a delay to this bill becoming law as it won’t be passed in time for the general election (June 2017), but will hopefully be reintroduced in the next Parliament.
Further ahead, there are questions that insurers need to ask around the connectivity aspect of these vehicles.
With cars communicating with each other, with transport infrastructure or indeed a local network transport operator, then data privacy, data access for third parties such as insurers, and cyber security are issues that need to be resolved.
For example, as there is a move towards connected and autonomous vehicles becoming a reality, it would be preferable to avoid an unnecessarily proprietary approach to essential data requirements.
If the goal is to create a transport ecosystem that is rooted in connectivity, then it is important to recognise that relevant information will be generated by onboard automated features, by vehicle-to-vehicle (V2V) communications, and by vehicle-to-infrastructure (V2I) communications. A level of data sharing between the various parties will be absolutely key.
However, the fast-paced nature of change in this area, coupled with the collaborative approach that the UK government and all sorts of different companies are taking, suggests it won't be too long until we begin to get some answers.
This article was originally published here on 9 May 2017 by ICE. It was written by Daniel O’Byrne, Head of Public Affairs, AXA UK.
--The Institution of Civil Engineers
[edit] Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki
- Articles by ICE on Designing Buildings Wiki.
- Autonomous vehicles.
- 2050 and the Future of Infrastructure.
- Autonomous vehicles - do we trust them?
- Autumn Statement 2016.
- Car sharing.
- Contemporary Cartography exhibition.
- Data-driven mobility.
- ‘Future Roads of Grand Paris’ Exhibition
- Highways in England and Wales.
- Infrastructure and Projects Authority.
- Our critical infrastructure is more vulnerable than ever. It doesn’t have to be that way.
- Queens Speech 2016.
- Road traffic management.
- Transport assessment.
- Transport design and health.
Featured articles and news
Twas the site before Christmas...
A rhyme for the industry and a thankyou to our supporters.
Plumbing and heating systems in schools
New apprentice pay rates coming into effect in the new year
Addressing the impact of recent national minimum wage changes.
EBSSA support for the new industry competence structure
The Engineering and Building Services Skills Authority, in working group 2.
Notes from BSRIA Sustainable Futures briefing
From carbon down to the all important customer: Redefining Retrofit for Net Zero Living.
Principal Designer: A New Opportunity for Architects
ACA launches a Principal Designer Register for architects.
A new government plan for housing and nature recovery
Exploring a new housing and infrastructure nature recovery framework.
Leveraging technology to enhance prospects for students
A case study on the significance of the Autodesk Revit certification.
Fundamental Review of Building Regulations Guidance
Announced during commons debate on the Grenfell Inquiry Phase 2 report.
CIAT responds to the updated National Planning Policy Framework
With key changes in the revised NPPF outlined.
Councils and communities highlighted for delivery of common-sense housing in planning overhaul
As government follows up with mandatory housing targets.
CIOB photographic competition final images revealed
Art of Building produces stunning images for another year.
HSE prosecutes company for putting workers at risk
Roofing company fined and its director sentenced.
Strategic restructure to transform industry competence
EBSSA becomes part of a new industry competence structure.
Major overhaul of planning committees proposed by government
Planning decisions set to be fast-tracked to tackle the housing crisis.
Industry Competence Steering Group restructure
ICSG transitions to the Industry Competence Committee (ICC) under the Building Safety Regulator (BSR).
Principal Contractor Competency Certification Scheme
CIOB PCCCS competence framework for Principal Contractors.
The CIAT Principal Designer register
Issues explained via a series of FAQs.